Florida state officials have just announced that thousands of Florida residents who currently possess firearm concealed carry permits may have just had their information compromised. Thousands of names of holders and hundreds of Social Security numbers were reportedly stolen by hackers. The data breach was initiated through the online payment system [more]
The state of Arizona has passed a brand new State Bill, which is obviously aimed at Tucson city's stubborn stance on firearm background checks. The new law is specifically targeting the private sale of guns amongst citizens. A city ordinance that required background checks for gun sales was passed more [more]
A new legislation that would have required health care workers in Colorado to undergo a fingerprint background check has now been stopped dead in its tracks in the state's Senate committee. The bill was an effort by Democrats to disqualify convicted felons and known offenders from holding sensitive positions in [more]
Despite the industry's initial forecast of slower gun sales under president Trump's administration, the FBI background check data has now shown a surprising spike for gun sales last month. The number of background checks that were conducted last month only serves to prove that having a gun-friendly president will not [more]
In a rather unexpected turn of events, gun sales for the past few months have steadily been declining, despite Trump's win in the United States Presidential Elections. With a president that is strongly supportive of second amendment rights, gun sales should have increased seeing as that there is now fewer restrictions [more]
The controversy regarding the alleged failure of the FBI to properly run a background check, which allowed Dylan Roof to purchase a firearm, is apparently not over just yet. A judge has denied all of the motions to dismiss the case and has now allowed it to proceed. United States District [more]
Earlier this year, there was a debate over a new gun bill, the major concern was whether to expand the FBI NICs background check to cover private sales. The people for the expanded checks like Mayor Bloomberg, and other organizations argued that this also helped prevented “straw sales”, the indirect acquisition of a firearm by a third-party, for money or other compensation, due to the individual not being able to or unwilling to purchase the gun himself; thus preventing guns from ending up in the wrong hands. On the other side however, opponents of the expanded checks like the NRA expressed their concern of the further restrictions on law-abiding citizens second amendment rights.
The Supreme Court of the United States is now hearing a straw sale case concerning a purchase that took place in Virginia where a former state trooper, Bruce Abramski, was charged of committing a straw sale purchase, for buying a firearm for his uncle but filled out the background check form (ATF Form 4473) indicating that the gun was for his own personal use. His defense was based on the fact that the person he purchased the gun for was, in fact, also legally able to buy a gun. Therefore making the defendant’s purchase and transfer of the gun to his uncle legal.
Several circuits have stated the government’s contention that the act of making a false statement on the 4473 form is, in and of itself, a violation of the law, regardless of the intention or additional facts in the case. But the Fifth Circuit upheld the case of U.S.A. Vs. Polk, that buying firearms for someone else, as long as the other individual is also qualified to own a gun, was completely permissible within the statutes that apply to form 4473.
The Polk case was a similar straw purchase conviction, although the actual purchase was made by an individual named Davidson who was acting on instructions from Polk to purchase more than forty different firearms, plastic explosives, grenades, a machine gun, and a light anti-tank weapons system. They were allegedly representing an organization called Constitutional America, that was planning a rebellion against the current United States government. Polk was finally arrested, charged and convicted of soliciting various crimes of violence, along with “aiding and abetting” a straw purchase even though he didn’t actually fill out the 4473.
Abramski, and the NRA, which represented him in the case, wants the Supreme Court to exonerate the former state trooper using their Polk defense. Abramski could have avoided the entire problem by having his Virginia dealer send the gun directly to his uncle’s dealer in Pennsylvania; licensed dealers do this all the time. Whatever the court’s decision would be, some factions have viewed the NRA’s move as desperate, stating that the 4473 form, with all its shortcomings, doesn’t give the purchaser the right to decide for himself whether the gun will eventually wind up in law-abiding hands.
Source: The Huffington Post